OP73 Tools That Can Aid Adaptive HTA To Ensure Rapid, Efficient, And Pragmatic Priority Setting: A Scoping Review
نویسندگان
چکیده
Introduction Producing new health technology assessments (HTA) can be a time-consuming process. With finite resources in HTA agencies, limited capacities countries without formalized processes, and growing interest for lifecycles approaches valuing technologies; innovative efficient processes are needed. “Adaptive HTA”, referring to the pragmatic use of methods existing evidence, might offer solutions. We will present results from scoping review that mapped tools, methods, practices transfer HTAs; reflect on these findings given our own experiences adaptation LMICs. Methods undertook systematically searched five electronic databases. Inclusion articles followed strict in- exclusion criteria. Data extraction focused information regarding could aid transferability analysis. Here, HTAs referred full-HTAs other products, as partial HTAs, economic evaluations, or systematic reviews. Lastly, we possible overarching factors affect transferability. Results The search (November 2020) identified 2030 hits, which 19 were included. Most transfers steps closely resemble de novo often checklists, merely aids “catalyst” provided guidance whole Contrastingly, three frameworks support process: European Network (EUnetHTA) Adaptation Toolkit, TRANSFER framework reviews, paper series reviews evaluations. pointed various challenges knowledge gaps; especially low middle income evidence is limited. Conclusions re-use reports not new; readily part adaptive processes. nature comes its ability unpack process Simultaneously, this highlighted gaps future experienced HTA-doers.
منابع مشابه
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.
OBJECTIVE While much literature has debated public engagement in health care decision-making, there is no consensus on when public engagement should be sought and how it should be obtained. We conducted a scoping review to examine public engagement in one specific area: priority setting and resource allocation. METHOD The review drew upon a broad range of health and non-health literature in a...
متن کاملHow to choose health technologies to be assessed by HTA? A review of criteria for priority setting.
INTRODUCTION Health Technology Assessment (HTA) plays a key role in the policy and decision-making process. Nevertheless, it is time- and resource-consuming, and therefore requires proper resource allocation. Priority setting, as a best way to organize effective and explicit resource allocation systems, may be applied even in this field. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to provide an overv...
متن کاملPriority Setting: Right Answer to a Far Too Narrow Question?; Comment on “Global Developments in Priority Setting in Health”
In their recent editorial, Baltussen and colleagues provide a concise summary of the prevailing discourse on priority-setting in health policy. Their perspective is entirely consistent with current practice, yet they unintentionally demonstrate the narrowness and moral precariousness of that discourse and practice. I respond with demonstrations of the importance of ‘interrogating scarcity’ in a...
متن کاملA scoping review of rapid review methods
BACKGROUND Rapid reviews are a form of knowledge synthesis in which components of the systematic review process are simplified or omitted to produce information in a timely manner. Although numerous centers are conducting rapid reviews internationally, few studies have examined the methodological characteristics of rapid reviews. We aimed to examine articles, books, and reports that evaluated, ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1471-6348', '0266-4623']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462322001222